Data and Citations
All data used in Open Navigator is properly cited and attributed. This page provides complete citations, licenses, BibTeX references, and links to original sources for academic research, government data, data sharing standards, and more.
Use this page to:
- β Cite data sources in your research or publications
- β Understand licensing and usage terms
- β Find original dataset documentation
- β Access API documentation and technical specs
This page documents all data sources, standards, and research contributions used in Open Navigator. All datasets and specifications are properly attributed with citations, licenses, and usage notes.
π Quick Navigationβ
MeetingBank, LocalView, CivicSearch, Datamuse API, Roper Center, CDP, City ScrapersποΈ Government Data
U.S. Census, IRS, Open States, LegiScanπ Data Sharing Standards
OCD-ID, Popolo, Schema.org, CEDS, OMOP CDMπ³οΈ Election & Advocacy
Ballotpedia, MIT Election Lab, OpenElectionsπ’ Nonprofit & Philanthropy
IRS EO-BMF (1.9M+ orgs), Google BigQuery (5M+ Form 990s), GivingTuesday Data Lake (5.4M+ raw XMLs), ProPublica (Nonprofits, Congress, Campaign Finance, Vital Signs), Every.org, Findhelp, 211, Microsoft CDM, ARDA, HIFLD, NCSβ Fact-Checking
Google, PolitiFact, FactCheck.orgπ» Civic Tech & Open Source
GitHub, Code for America, Hackathons, Microsoft, Google, AWS, Databricks, DPGAπ Community Solutions & Use Cases
Spectrum of Engagement, Harvard, Brookings, Open Data Impact, IATIπ Acknowledgments
Organizations & individuals
π Academic Researchβ
In this section:
- MeetingBank Dataset
- LocalView Dataset (Harvard Dataverse)
- Council Data Project (CDP)
- City Scrapers / Documenters.org
- Roper Center for Public Opinion Research
- Harvard Dataverse
- CivicSearch (School Board Meeting Platform)
- Datamuse API (Word-Finding Engine)
MeetingBank Datasetβ
What we use: 1,366 city council meetings from 6 U.S. cities with transcripts and summaries for meeting discovery, transcript analysis, and summarization benchmarking.
Citation:
Yebowen Hu, Tim Ganter, Hanieh Deilamsalehy, Franck Dernoncourt, Hassan Foroosh, Fei Liu. "MeetingBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Meeting Summarization" In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), July 2023, Toronto, Canada.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{hu-etal-2023-meetingbank,
title = "MeetingBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Meeting Summarization",
author = "Yebowen Hu and Tim Ganter and Hanieh Deilamsalehy and Franck Dernoncourt and Hassan Foroosh and Fei Liu",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)",
month = July,
year = "2023",
address = "Toronto, Canada",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
}
Resources:
LocalView Dataset (Harvard Dataverse)β
Organization: Harvard University Mellon Urbanism Lab
What we use: 1,000+ municipalities with meeting videos and automated transcripts for large-scale civic data analysis.
- Website: https://www.localview.net/
- Dataverse: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/NJTBEM
- GitHub: https://mellonurbanism.harvard.edu/localview
- Coverage: Thousands of U.S. jurisdictions with continuous data collection
- Data Included:
- Meeting videos (YouTube URLs)
- Automated transcripts via speech-to-text
- Metadata (meeting dates, agencies, agendas)
- Quality tracking per jurisdiction
- License: Research use (Harvard Dataverse)
- Research-grade: Designed for large-scale quantitative analysis
BibTeX:
@dataset{localview_2024,
author = {{Harvard Mellon Urbanism Lab}},
title = {LocalView: Municipal Meeting Videos and Transcripts},
year = {2024},
publisher = {Harvard Dataverse},
doi = {10.7910/DVN/NJTBEM},
url = {https://www.localview.net/}
}
Council Data Project (CDP)β
Organization: Open-source civic tech collaboration
What we use: 20+ cities with complete data pipelines - meeting transcripts, videos, voting records, and legislation tracking.
- Website: https://councildataproject.org/
- GitHub: https://github.com/CouncilDataProject
- Coverage: 20+ major U.S. cities with full infrastructure
- Data Included:
- Meeting transcripts (searchable, indexed)
- Video recordings with timestamps
- Voting records and roll calls
- Legislation text and tracking
- Councilmember information
- Infrastructure: Complete ETL pipelines for each city
- License: Open source (MIT)
- API: Per-city deployments (e.g., https://councildataproject.org/seattle)
BibTeX:
@software{council_data_project,
title = {Council Data Project},
author = {{Council Data Project Contributors}},
year = {2024},
url = {https://councildataproject.org/},
license = {MIT}
}
City Scrapers / Documenters.orgβ
Organization: Documenters Network (civic journalism collaboration)
What we use: 100-500 validated government agency URLs across 5 major cities for automated meeting discovery.
- Website: https://cityscrapers.org/
- Documenters: https://www.documenters.org/
- GitHub: https://github.com/City-Bureau
- Coverage: Chicago, Pittsburgh, Detroit, Cleveland, Los Angeles
- Data Included:
- Government agency URLs (start_urls from spider files)
- Granicus video page URLs with YouTube embeds
- Meeting event schemas
- Scraper patterns for common platforms
- Cities Covered:
- Chicago City Scrapers
- Pittsburgh City Scrapers
- Detroit Documenters
- Cleveland City Scrapers
- LA Metro Documenters
- License: Open source (MIT)
- Use Case: Pre-validated URLs for quality meeting discovery
BibTeX:
@software{city_scrapers,
title = {City Scrapers},
author = {{City Bureau and Documenters Network}},
year = {2024},
url = {https://cityscrapers.org/},
license = {MIT}
}
Roper Center for Public Opinion Researchβ
Organization: Cornell University
What we use: Scientifically validated survey questions and public opinion baselines for topic definitions and messaging optimization.
- Source: https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/
- iPoll Database: https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/ipoll/
- Coverage: 500,000+ survey questions from 1930s-present, all major polling organizations
- License: Free public search (metadata and question wording), full data requires institutional membership
- Citation: "Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, Cornell University. iPoll Databank. https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/ipoll/"
Harvard Dataverseβ
What we use: Meeting datasets and civic engagement research.
- Source: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/
- License: Varies by dataset
- Coverage: Academic research datasets on local government, public meetings, civic participation
CivicSearch (School Board Meeting Platform)β
Organization: Datamuse, Inc.
What we use: Aggregated school board meeting transcripts, agendas, and videos for tracking education policy and local governance.
- Website: https://schools.civicsearch.org/
- Platform: Datamuse-powered civic search interface
- Coverage: School districts nationwide with meeting transcripts and videos
- Data Included:
- School board meeting transcripts (AI-indexed)
- Meeting agendas and minutes
- Video recordings (when available)
- Searchable text across multiple districts
- Meeting dates and attendance
- Example: Tuscaloosa City Schools
- License: Free public access for search; bulk/API access requires case-by-case approval
- Use Case: Education policy tracking, school board decision analysis, parent/community engagement
Access Tiers:
- Public Search: Free access via web interface
- Bulk Data/API: Contact Datamuse for research or civic organization partnerships
- Commercial Use: Licensing required for commercial applications
Data Privacy:
- Public meeting transcripts are public record
- Datamuse indexing and presentation subject to their site terms
- No user-uploaded data sold to third parties
Attribution Requirements:
Data source: CivicSearch (Datamuse, Inc.)
https://schools.civicsearch.org/
School board meeting transcripts and agendas
Terms of Service:
- β No automated scraping - Use official API when available
- β Attribution required - Link back to CivicSearch for data used
- β Public record data - Meeting transcripts are generally public domain
- β οΈ Bulk access - Requires partnership agreement for large-scale data extraction
BibTeX:
@misc{civicsearch_datamuse,
author = {{Datamuse, Inc.}},
title = {CivicSearch: School Board Meeting Platform},
year = {2026},
url = {https://schools.civicsearch.org/},
note = {AI-indexed school board meeting transcripts and agendas}
}
Contact for Data Partnerships: For bulk data access, API integration, or civic tech collaborations, reach out to Datamuse directly as a "civic technologist" or research organization. There is no standard commercial checkout - partnerships are handled case-by-case.
Datamuse API (Word-Finding Engine)β
Organization: Datamuse, Inc.
What we use: Natural language processing tools for text analysis, word associations, rhyme detection, and semantic search in meeting transcripts and policy documents.
- API Documentation: https://www.datamuse.com/api/
- Developer Site: https://www.datamuse.com/
- Use Cases: Dictionary apps, RhymeZone, word associations, semantic search
- Coverage: English language word relationships, definitions, pronunciations, usage frequency
- License: Free tier for most applications; paid tier for high-volume commercial use
API Endpoints:
/words- Word finding based on constraints (rhymes, similar meaning, etc.)/sug- Word suggestions for autocomplete- Query parameters for semantic relationships, phonetic matching, vocabulary
Pricing Tiers:
| Tier | Cost | Limits | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100,000 requests/day | Non-commercial, small commercial apps |
| Professional | Contact for pricing | Unlimited + support | High-volume commercial applications |
Free Tier Details:
- β 100,000 requests per day - Generous limit for most applications
- β Commercial use allowed - Can use in commercial apps under daily limit
- β No API key required - Simple HTTP GET requests
- β Fast response times - Optimized for real-time applications
Paid Tier (High-Volume):
- Exceeding 100,000 requests/day requires paid tier
- Contact Datamuse for custom pricing and SLA
- Dedicated support and guaranteed uptime
Attribution Requirements:
- β Link to Datamuse: Required (or strongly requested) for free tier users
- β Credit in documentation: Mention "Powered by Datamuse API"
- Example:
<a href="https://www.datamuse.com/">Powered by Datamuse API</a>
Restrictions:
- β No scraping of web interfaces - Use official API, not web scraping
- β Rate limiting enforced - Exceeding 100K/day will be throttled
- β Caching allowed - Can cache results to reduce API calls
Terms of Service:
- Free tier subject to daily quota
- No sale of user-uploaded data
- Commercial use allowed within free tier limits
- Bulk/enterprise usage requires paid license
Example API Call:
# Find words that mean "government" and sound like "regime"
curl "https://api.datamuse.com/words?ml=government&sl=regime"
# Find words that rhyme with "policy"
curl "https://api.datamuse.com/words?rel_rhy=policy"
# Word associations for "civic engagement"
curl "https://api.datamuse.com/words?ml=civic+engagement&max=10"
BibTeX:
@misc{datamuse_api,
author = {{Datamuse, Inc.}},
title = {Datamuse API: Word-Finding Query Engine},
year = {2026},
url = {https://www.datamuse.com/api/},
note = {Free tier: 100,000 requests/day. Commercial use allowed.}
}
Integration Use Cases:
- Meeting Transcript Analysis: Identify policy-related terms and semantic relationships
- Search Enhancement: Improve search with synonym expansion and related terms
- Topic Modeling: Extract key themes from public comments and testimony
- Accessibility: Provide word suggestions for users with cognitive disabilities
- Multilingual Support: Word associations for translation assistance
Datamuse.ai (Separate Product): Note: Datamuse.ai is a distinct SaaS product for natural language exploration:
- Starter: ~$29/month (100 queries/month)
- Professional: ~$99/month (unlimited queries + API access)
- Free Trial: Available for testing This is separate from the word-finding API and has different pricing.
ποΈ Government Dataβ
In this section:
U.S. Census Bureauβ
What we use: Geographic boundaries, demographic data, population estimates, and economic indicators.
- Source: https://www.census.gov/
- License: Public Domain (U.S. Government)
- Datasets: Census Gazetteer, American Community Survey (ACS), Decennial Census
- Coverage: All 50 states, 3,144 counties, 19,000+ incorporated places
IRS Exempt Organizations Business Master File (EO-BMF)β
Organization: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), U.S. Department of Treasury
What we use: PRIMARY BULK DATA SOURCE for comprehensive nonprofit data - ALL 1.9M+ U.S. tax-exempt organizations with EIN, NTEE codes, financial data, subsection classification, and geographic location.
- Source: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/exempt-organizations-business-master-file-extract-eo-bmf
- Search Tool: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/tax-exempt-organization-search
- Bulk Downloads: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/tax-exempt-organization-search-bulk-data-downloads
- API Documentation: See IRS Bulk Data Integration
- Coverage: 1,952,238 organizations (as of April 2026)
- Churches & Religious Organizations: 300,000+ (NTEE codes X, X20, X21, X22, X30, X40)
- Health Organizations: 80,000+ (NTEE codes E, E20-E99)
- Human Services: 200,000+ (NTEE codes P, P20-P99)
- All Other Categories: 1.3M+ (Education, Arts, Environment, etc.)
- Update Frequency: Monthly
- License: Public domain (U.S. government data)
- Format: CSV (regional files), convertible to Parquet
- Record Count: 1.9M+ total nonprofits across 4 regional files
Data Fields (28 columns):
- Identification: EIN, organization name, sort name
- Location: Street address, city, state, ZIP code
- Classification: NTEE code, subsection (501(c)(3), etc.), foundation code
- Financial: Asset amount, income amount, revenue amount
- Status: Tax-exempt status, deductibility status, ruling date
- Organization: Organization code, activity codes, group affiliation
NTEE Codes for Churches:
- X - Religion Related, Spiritual Development
- X20 - Christian (churches, ministries)
- X21 - Protestant
- X22 - Roman Catholic
- X30 - Jewish
- X40 - Islamic
Use Cases:
- Bulk Download: Get ALL nonprofits in a state (e.g., 26,148 in Alabama vs 25 from ProPublica API)
- Comprehensive Coverage: 1,000x more data per request than API methods
- Offline Analysis: Download once, query locally forever (cached as Parquet)
- NTEE Filtering: Filter by category code (health, education, religion, etc.)
- Geographic Analysis: Complete state/city/ZIP coverage for spatial mapping
BibTeX Citation:
@misc{irs_eobmf_2026,
title = {Exempt Organizations Business Master File Extract (EO-BMF)},
author = {{Internal Revenue Service}},
year = {2026},
month = {April},
url = {https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/exempt-organizations-business-master-file-extract-eo-bmf},
note = {Record count: 1,952,238 organizations. Updated monthly.}
}
Integration:
- ProPublica API complements with detailed Form 990 financials and mission statements
- Every.org adds human-readable descriptions and cause tags
- IRS EO-BMF provides the complete foundation layer with all organizations
Complements:
- ARDA for congregation characteristics and health ministry programs
- HIFLD for geospatial location data
- National Congregations Study for social service provision patterns
- ProPublica API for detailed financial breakdowns and executive compensation
Open States / Plural Policy ββ
Organization: Plural Policy (formerly Open States Foundation)
What we use: State and local legislative information - bulk downloads of bills, votes, legislators, and legislative sessions for all 50 states.
- Website: https://openstates.org/
- API Documentation: https://openstates.org/api/
- Bulk Downloads: https://open.pluralpolicy.com/data/ β Recommended approach
- Scrapers Repository: https://github.com/openstates/openstates-scrapers
- Local Database Setup: https://docs.openstates.org/contributing/local-database/
- Code of Conduct: https://docs.openstates.org/code-of-conduct/
- Schema Documentation: https://github.com/openstates/people/blob/master/schema.md
Coverage:
- All 50 states + DC + Puerto Rico
- 7,300+ state legislators with committee assignments
- Millions of bills with full text, votes, and sponsors
- Monthly PostgreSQL dumps (9.8GB+) for complete local analysis
- Video sources (YouTube channels, Granicus portals)
License:
- Bulk data: Public Domain (preferred method)
- API content: Varies by state
- API Key: Free tier (50,000 requests/month)
Bulk Data Formats:
- CSV: Complete legislative sessions per state
- URL: https://data.openstates.org/session/csv/
- Best for: Spreadsheet analysis, quick exploration
- JSON: Bills with full text and metadata
- URL: https://data.openstates.org/session/json/
- Best for: Application integration, detailed parsing
- PostgreSQL: Monthly database dumps
- URL: https://data.openstates.org/postgres/monthly/
- Best for: SQL analysis, local development, complete schema
- Size: 9.8GB+ (complete legislative database)
- No rate limits on bulk downloads
What We Use:
- PostgreSQL monthly dumps for local database (see
scripts/bulk_legislative_download.py) - CSV/JSON session data for specific state analysis
- Video source discovery (YouTube channels, Granicus portals)
- Legislator contact information and committee assignments
Potential Contributions: Our project could contribute back to the OpenStates ecosystem:
- Scraper patterns for video sources and meeting archives
- Meeting video discovery to enhance their data
- Granicus/YouTube integrations for automated tracking
- We follow their Code of Conduct for all contributions
Local Database Setup: We use the PostgreSQL dumps following their local database documentation:
# Download monthly dump
python scripts/bulk_legislative_download.py --postgres --month 2026-04
# Restore to PostgreSQL
./scripts/setup_openstates_db.sh
BibTeX:
@software{openstates,
title = {Open States},
author = {{Plural Policy}},
year = {2024},
url = {https://openstates.org/},
note = {Comprehensive state legislative data for all 50 U.S. states}
}
LegiScan ββ
Organization: LegiScan
What we use: Comprehensive state legislative tracking with bill text, votes, people, and datasets for all 50 states.
- Website: https://legiscan.com/
- API Documentation: https://legiscan.com/legiscan
- Dataset Downloads: https://legiscan.com/datasets
- People Database: https://legiscan.com/legiscan/people
- Bill Search: https://legiscan.com/
Coverage:
- All 50 states + DC + U.S. Congress
- Current and historical legislation back to 2011
- Bill text, sponsors, votes, amendments with full tracking
- 370,000+ legislators (current and historical)
- Roll call votes with individual legislator positions
- Committee assignments and hearing schedules
- Fiscal notes and impact statements
Available Datasets:
- National Dataset: Complete legislative data for all states
- All bills, resolutions, and legislative documents
- Updated daily during legislative sessions
- Includes bill text, sponsors, status tracking
- State-Specific Datasets: Per-state downloads
- Session-specific or multi-year data
- Optimized for state-level analysis
- People Dataset: Legislator information
- Contact details, committee assignments
- District information and party affiliation
- Historical legislator records
- Roll Call Dataset: Voting records
- Individual votes on bills and amendments
- Voting patterns and trends
- Committee and floor votes
API Access:
- Free Tier: 30,000 requests per month
- API Key: Required (free registration)
- Bulk Downloads: Available for subscribers
- Real-time Updates: Daily synchronization during sessions
Data Format:
- JSON API for programmatic access
- CSV/Excel exports for datasets
- SQL dumps available for subscribers
- RSS feeds for bill monitoring
What We Use:
- Bill text and status for legislative tracking (see
scripts/legislative_tracker.py) - Legislator contact information for advocacy features
- Roll call votes for voting pattern analysis
- Dataset downloads for bulk legislative analysis
Comparison with Open States:
- LegiScan: More detailed bill tracking, commercial support, datasets for download
- Open States: Free bulk PostgreSQL dumps, open source scrapers, community-driven
Both are complementary - we use Open States for bulk data and LegiScan for detailed bill tracking and datasets.
License:
- API data: Terms of Service apply (https://legiscan.com/legiscan)
- Datasets: Subscription required for bulk downloads
- API Key: Free tier available
Use Cases:
- Track legislation by keyword (e.g., "fluoridation", "oral health")
- Monitor bill progress across multiple states
- Analyze legislator voting patterns
- Build advocacy alerts and notifications
- Research legislative trends over time
BibTeX:
@misc{legiscan,
title = {LegiScan: State and Federal Legislative Tracking},
author = {{LegiScan}},
year = {2024},
url = {https://legiscan.com/},
note = {Comprehensive legislative data for all 50 U.S. states and Congress}
}
Documentation: https://legiscan.com/legiscan
Support: support@legiscan.com
Terms: https://legiscan.com/legiscan
π Data Sharing Standardsβ
In this section:
- Open Civic Data (OCD) Standards
- Popolo Project
- Schema.org
- Common Education Data Standards (CEDS)
- OMOP Common Data Model (OHDSI)
Open Civic Data (OCD) Standardsβ
What we use: Standardized jurisdiction identifiers for cross-platform compatibility.
Standard: OCDEP 2 - Division Identifiers
- Repository: https://github.com/opencivicdata/ocd-division-ids
- License: Open source
- Format:
ocd-division/country:us/state:al/place:birmingham - Coverage: All U.S. jurisdictions (cities, counties, states, school districts)
Example Implementation:
ocd-division/country:us/state:al # State
ocd-division/country:us/state:al/county:jefferson # County
ocd-division/country:us/state:al/place:birmingham # City
ocd-division/country:us/state:al/school_district:birmingham_city # School District
Popolo Projectβ
What we use: International open government data specification for people, organizations, and elected positions.
- Specification: https://www.popoloproject.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/popolo-project/popolo-spec
- License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Adoption: Used by Civic Commons, OpenNorth, mySociety, Sunlight Foundation, and 30+ civic tech organizations worldwide
Popolo Classes Implemented:
| Popolo Class | Our Entity | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Person | LEADER | Elected officials, appointees |
| Organization | ORGANIZATION | Nonprofits, government agencies |
| Membership | LEADER β ORGANIZATION | Relationships with roles and terms |
| Post | LEADER.position_type | Positions like "Mayor", "Council Member" |
| VoteEvent | VOTE | Voting records on motions/bills |
| Motion | AGENDA, LEGISLATION | Formal proposals |
| Area | JURISDICTION | Geographic/political boundaries |
| Event | MEETING | Public meetings with agendas |
Popolo Dependencies (15 W3C/IETF Standards)
| Standard | Prefix | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| FOAF | foaf | People, social networks |
| vCard | vcard | Contact information (IETF RFC 6350) |
| Schema.org | schema | Structured web data |
| DCMI Terms | dcterms | Metadata, provenance |
| W3C Organization Ontology | org | Organizational structures |
| ISA Location | locn | Addresses, geographic data |
| GeoNames | gn | Geographic identifiers |
| SKOS | skos | Taxonomies, classification |
| BIO | bio | Life events, relationships |
| BIBFRAME | bf | Bibliographic references |
| W3C Contact | con | Contact utility concepts |
| NEPOMUK Calendar | ncal | Events, meetings |
| ISA Person | person | Person attributes |
| RDF Schema | rdfs | Semantic web foundation |
| ODRS | odrs | Data licensing |
Schema.orgβ
Organization: W3C Community Group (sponsors: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Yandex)
What we use: SEO-optimized structured data, JSON-LD exports, semantic web compatibility.
- Source: https://schema.org/
- License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA 3.0)
- Coverage: 800+ types, 1,400+ properties
Our Schema.org Type Mappings:
| Our Entity | Schema.org Type | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| JURISDICTION | AdministrativeArea | City/county pages |
| MEETING | Event | Google Calendar rich results |
| LEADER | Person + GovernmentOfficial | Official profiles |
| ORGANIZATION | Organization + NGO | Nonprofit listings |
| LEGISLATION | Legislation | Bill tracking |
| BALLOT_MEASURE | Legislation | Ballot guides |
| VOTE | VoteAction | Voting records |
| FACT_CHECK | ClaimReview | Google Fact Check Explorer |
| SCHOOL_DISTRICT | EducationalOrganization | School district info |
| VIDEO | VideoObject | YouTube integration |
| DOCUMENT | DigitalDocument | Document library |
| CONSTITUENT | Person | Donor/volunteer profiles |
| DONATION | DonateAction | Donation receipts |
| CAMPAIGN | FundingScheme | Fundraising campaigns |
| PROGRAM_DELIVERY | Service | Program catalog |
Benefits:
- β Google Search rich results
- β Voice assistant compatibility (Alexa, Google Assistant)
- β Knowledge Graph integration
- β Cross-platform (Apple, Bing, Yandex)
Common Education Data Standards (CEDS)β
Organization: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
What we use: School district data modeling, NCES interoperability, education finance tracking.
- Source: https://ceds.ed.gov/
- GitHub: https://github.com/CEDStandards
- License: Public Domain (U.S. Government)
- Coverage: 2,300+ data elements, 500+ option sets
CEDS Alignment:
| Our Field | CEDS Element ID | CEDS Element Name |
|---|---|---|
nces_id | 000827 | LEA Identifier (NCES) |
district_name | 000168 | Name of Institution |
total_students | 001475 | Student Count |
total_revenue | 000612 | Total Revenue |
per_pupil_spending | 000613 | Expenditure per Student |
Benefits:
- β NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) compatibility
- β F-33 Finance Survey alignment
- β Federal grant reporting (ESSA, Title I, IDEA)
OMOP Common Data Model (OHDSI)β
Organization: Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI)
What we use: Vocabulary and terminology standardization system - CONCEPT, VOCABULARY, CONCEPT_CLASS, CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP tables for consistent data classification.
- Source: https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/
- GitHub: https://github.com/OHDSI/CommonDataModel
- Vocabulary Documentation: https://ohdsi.github.io/TheBookOfOhdsi/StandardizedVocabularies.html
- License: Apache License 2.0
- Coverage: Comprehensive vocabulary system for standardizing concepts across domains
OMOP CDM Tables We Implement:
| Table | Purpose | Our Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| CONCEPT | Master vocabulary list | Standardized codes for topics, demographics, classifications |
| VOCABULARY | Source vocabularies | Track origin of concepts (NTEE, FIPS, Schema.org, etc.) |
| CONCEPT_CLASS | Categorization | Group concepts by type (demographic, geographic, topic) |
| CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP | Linkages | Map relationships between concepts (is-a, maps-to, subsumes) |
Our OMOP-Inspired Vocabularies:
| Vocabulary ID | Description | Concept Count |
|---|---|---|
NTEE | National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities | 600+ |
FIPS | Federal Information Processing Standards | 90,000+ |
Schema.org | Structured data types | 800+ |
Popolo | Open government data specs | 15+ |
OCD-ID | Open Civic Data identifiers | 22,000+ |
CEDS | Common Education Data Standards | 2,300+ |
CENSUS | U.S. Census categories | 1,000+ |
INTERNAL | Custom platform classifications | 500+ |
Example Implementation:
-- CONCEPT table: standardized demographics
concept_id | concept_name | vocabulary_id | concept_class_id
-----------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------
100001 | Race: White | CENSUS | Demographic
100002 | Race: Black/African Amer. | CENSUS | Demographic
100003 | Hispanic/Latino Ethnicity | CENSUS | Demographic
100004 | Gender: Male | CENSUS | Demographic
-- CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP: hierarchies
concept_id_1 | concept_id_2 | relationship_id
-------------|--------------|----------------
100002 | 100000 | Is a # Race category
100003 | 100010 | Is a # Ethnicity category
Benefits:
- β Consistent terminology across all datasets
- β Hierarchical concept relationships
- β Traceable concept provenance (source vocabularies)
- β Industry-standard approach used by healthcare and research institutions
- β Supports multiple classification systems simultaneously
BibTeX:
@misc{ohdsi_omop_cdm,
author = {{Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI)}},
title = {OMOP Common Data Model},
year = {2024},
url = {https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/},
license = {Apache-2.0}
}
π³οΈ Election & Advocacyβ
In this section:
Ballotpediaβ
Organization: Lucy Burns Institute
What we use: Ballot measures, referendums, propositions for fluoridation tracking and health policy analysis.
- Source: https://ballotpedia.org/
- API: https://ballotpedia.org/API-documentation
- Coverage: All 50 states, historical measures back to 1990s
- License: API access limited at scale (paid tier available)
MIT Election Data + Science Labβ
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
What we use: County-level election results for political composition analysis.
- Source: https://electionlab.mit.edu/data
- Repository: https://github.com/MEDSL/official-returns
- Coverage: 1976-present, presidential/congressional/gubernatorial results
- License: Free for research and commercial use
OpenElectionsβ
What we use: State-by-state certified election results in standardized CSV format.
- Source: https://openelections.net/
- GitHub: https://github.com/openelections
- Coverage: All 50 states (various completion levels), precinct-level data
- License: Open source (varies by state)
π’ Nonprofit & Philanthropyβ
In this section:
- IRS Exempt Organizations Business Master File (EO-BMF) - PRIMARY BULK DATA SOURCE (1.9M+ orgs)
- Google BigQuery IRS 990 Data - RECOMMENDED FOR BULK FORM 990 ENRICHMENT (5M+ filings)
- GivingTuesday 990 Data Infrastructure - AWS S3 DATA LAKE (5.4M+ raw Form 990 XMLs)
- ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
- ProPublica Congress API
- ProPublica Campaign Finance API
- ProPublica Vital Signs API
- Every.org Charity API
- Findhelp.org (Aunt Bertha)
- 211 Regional Directories
- Association of Religion Data Archives (ARDA)
- Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD): Places of Worship
- National Congregations Study (NCS)
- Microsoft Common Data Model for Nonprofits
IRS Exempt Organizations Business Master File (EO-BMF)β
Organization: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), U.S. Department of Treasury
What we use: PRIMARY BULK DATA SOURCE for comprehensive nonprofit data - ALL 1.9M+ U.S. tax-exempt organizations with EIN, NTEE codes, financial data, subsection classification, and geographic location.
- Source: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/exempt-organizations-business-master-file-extract-eo-bmf
- Search Tool: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/tax-exempt-organization-search
- Bulk Downloads: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/tax-exempt-organization-search-bulk-data-downloads
- API Documentation: See IRS Bulk Data Integration
- Coverage: 1,952,238 organizations (as of April 2026)
- Churches & Religious Organizations: 300,000+ (NTEE codes X, X20, X21, X22, X30, X40)
- Health Organizations: 80,000+ (NTEE codes E, E20-E99)
- Human Services: 200,000+ (NTEE codes P, P20-P99)
- All Other Categories: 1.3M+ (Education, Arts, Environment, etc.)
- Update Frequency: Monthly
- License: Public domain (U.S. government data)
- Format: CSV (regional files), convertible to Parquet
- Record Count: 1.9M+ total nonprofits across 4 regional files
Data Fields (28 columns):
- Identification: EIN, organization name, sort name
- Location: Street address, city, state, ZIP code
- Classification: NTEE code, subsection (501(c)(3), etc.), foundation code
- Financial: Asset amount, income amount, revenue amount
- Status: Tax-exempt status, deductibility status, ruling date
- Organization: Organization code, activity codes, group affiliation
NTEE Codes for Churches:
- X - Religion Related, Spiritual Development
- X20 - Christian (churches, ministries)
- X21 - Protestant
- X22 - Roman Catholic
- X30 - Jewish
- X40 - Islamic
Use Cases:
- Bulk Download: Get ALL nonprofits in a state (e.g., 26,148 in Alabama vs 25 from ProPublica API)
- Comprehensive Coverage: 1,000x more data per request than API methods
- Offline Analysis: Download once, query locally forever (cached as Parquet)
- NTEE Filtering: Filter by category code (health, education, religion, etc.)
- Geographic Analysis: Complete state/city/ZIP coverage for spatial mapping
BibTeX Citation:
@misc{irs_eobmf_2026,
title = {Exempt Organizations Business Master File Extract (EO-BMF)},
author = {{Internal Revenue Service}},
year = {2026},
month = {April},
url = {https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/exempt-organizations-business-master-file-extract-eo-bmf},
note = {Record count: 1,952,238 organizations. Updated monthly.}
}
Integration:
- ProPublica API complements with detailed Form 990 financials and mission statements
- Every.org adds human-readable descriptions and cause tags
- IRS EO-BMF provides the complete foundation layer with all organizations
Complements:
- ARDA for congregation characteristics and health ministry programs
- HIFLD for geospatial location data
- National Congregations Study for social service provision patterns
- ProPublica API for detailed financial breakdowns and executive compensation
Google BigQuery IRS 990 Dataβ
Organization: Google Cloud Platform (IRS data mirrored by Google)
What we use: RECOMMENDED FOR BULK FORM 990 ENRICHMENT - SQL-queryable IRS Form 990 electronic filings with detailed financial data, mission statements, and program descriptions.
- Source: https://console.cloud.google.com/marketplace/product/internal-revenue-service/irs-990
- Documentation: https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/irs-990-dataset
- BigQuery Dataset:
bigquery-public-data.irs_990 - Coverage: 5,000,000+ Form 990 electronic filings (2011-present)
- Update Frequency: Annually (updated when IRS publishes new data)
- License: Public domain (U.S. government data, hosted by Google)
- Format: SQL-queryable tables in BigQuery
- Cost: Free tier includes 1 TB of queries per month
Available Tables:
irs_990.irs_990_2013-irs_990.irs_990_2024- Individual years (2013-2024)irs_990.irs_990_ein- All filings aggregated by EINirs_990.irs_990_pf_2013-irs_990.irs_990_pf_2024- Private foundation filings (Form 990-PF)
Data Fields (100+ columns):
- Identification: EIN, organization name, tax year
- Financials:
- Total revenue, contributions, program service revenue, investment income
- Total expenses, program expenses, management expenses, fundraising expenses
- Total assets, total liabilities, net assets
- Grants paid, grants received
- Mission & Programs:
- Mission description (text field)
- Program service accomplishments (up to 10 programs with descriptions)
- Program service expenses per program
- Governance:
- Number of voting members, independent members
- Officer and director compensation
- Key employee information
- Activities:
- Legislative activities, political expenditures, lobbying
- Foreign operations, foreign grants
- Website URL
- Compliance:
- Public inspection policies
- Conflict of interest policies
- Whistleblower policies
Key Advantages:
- Serverless SQL: Query 5M+ records without downloading files
- Mission Extraction: Get mission statements and program descriptions in bulk
- Website URLs: Extract organization websites (not in EO-BMF)
- Historical Data: 10+ years of financial trends per organization
- Scalable: Process thousands of nonprofits in a single query
- No API Rate Limits: Unlike ProPublica's 25-record limit
Example Use Cases:
- Bulk Mission Enrichment: Extract mission statements for all health nonprofits in Alabama
- Website Discovery: Get organization websites for outreach campaigns
- Financial Trend Analysis: Track revenue/expense trends over 10 years
- Program Service Analysis: Identify nonprofits by specific program keywords
- Grant Analysis: Find organizations that award grants vs. receive grants
Setup Requirements:
- Create a Google Cloud project
- Enable BigQuery API
- Authenticate:
# Option A: Application default credentialsgcloud auth application-default login# Option B: Service account keyexport GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS="path/to/credentials.json"
Example Query (Extract Alabama Health Nonprofits with Missions):
SELECT
ein,
organization_name,
tax_year,
mission_description,
website,
total_revenue,
total_expenses,
program_service_expenses
FROM `bigquery-public-data.irs_990.irs_990_2023`
WHERE state = 'AL'
AND mission_description LIKE '%health%'
AND total_revenue > 100000
ORDER BY total_revenue DESC
LIMIT 1000
BibTeX Citation:
@misc{google_bigquery_irs990,
title = {IRS 990 Dataset},
author = {{Google Cloud Platform} and {Internal Revenue Service}},
year = {2024},
url = {https://console.cloud.google.com/marketplace/product/internal-revenue-service/irs-990},
note = {BigQuery public dataset: bigquery-public-data.irs\_990. Coverage: 5M+ Form 990 electronic filings (2011-present)}
}
Integration:
- IRS EO-BMF provides the complete organization registry (1.9M+ orgs)
- Google BigQuery enriches with mission statements, websites, and detailed financials
- ProPublica API adds executive compensation and recent filing details
- GivingTuesday Data Lake provides raw XML for custom field extraction
Complements:
- See Form 990 XML Data (GivingTuesday Data Lake) for alternative bulk download approach
- See IRS Bulk Data Integration for EO-BMF foundation layer
Cost Estimates:
- Free tier: 1 TB queries/month = ~2-4 million nonprofit records
- Beyond free tier: $5 per TB after first 1 TB
- Example: Enriching 100,000 nonprofits with missions = ~20 GB = Free
GivingTuesday 990 Data Infrastructureβ
Organization: GivingTuesday
What we use: Raw Form 990 XML filings from AWS S3 for detailed financial data extraction, custom field parsing, and comprehensive nonprofit analysis.
- Website: https://990data.givingtuesday.org/
- Data Lake:
s3://gt990datalake-rawdata(AWS S3, us-east-1 Virginia, Public Access) - Console: https://us-east-1.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/gt990datalake-rawdata
- Coverage: 5.4M+ e-filed Form 990s (2011-present, ~300K new filings/year)
- Scale: ~10 TB of raw XML data
- Update Frequency: Ongoing (as IRS publishes new e-filings)
- License: Public domain (IRS data) + Open source tools
- Access: Free, no AWS credentials required (anonymous access via
--no-sign-request) - Format: XML files (1-2 MB each) + CSV/Parquet indices
Data Lake Structure:
s3://gt990datalake-rawdata/
βββ EfileData/
β βββ XmlFiles/ # Individual 990 XMLs (~5.4M files, ~10 TB)
β β βββ [OBJECT_ID]_public.xml (e.g., 202233259349300703_public.xml)
β βββ XmlZips/ # ZIP archives (97 files, ~38 GB β ~95 GB uncompressed)
β βββ YYYY_TEOS_XML_*.zip (e.g., 2023_TEOS_XML_01A.zip ~400 MB)
βββ Indices/
βββ 990xmls/ # CSV indices with metadata
βββ index_all_years_efiledata_xmls_created_on_2023-10-29.csv (~925 MB)
Download Strategies:
| Approach | Best For | Time | Bandwidth | Storage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual XMLs | Single state or targeted | ~2 hrs (22K orgs) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| ZIP Archives | All states / nationwide | ~6 hrs total | 38 GB | 95 GB |
Choose Individual XMLs when:
- You need data for 1-5 states only
- You want to download only specific EINs
- Storage space is limited
- You want incremental caching
Choose ZIP Archives when:
- You need all 50 states
- You're building a comprehensive database
- You have 100+ GB storage
- You want offline access to all filings
What You Can Extract:
- Financials: Revenue, expenses, assets, liabilities, net income, grants paid/received
- Programs: Detailed program descriptions, accomplishments, expenses per program (up to 10)
- Governance: Officer compensation, board members, key employees (with names and titles)
- Activities: Legislative activities, lobbying expenses, political contributions
- Mission: Organization mission statement and activity descriptions
- Website: Organization website URLs
- Grants: List of grant recipients with amounts (for grantmaking organizations)
- Custom Fields: Any field in the IRS Form 990 schema (990, 990-EZ, 990-PF)
S3 Access Examples:
Individual XMLs (for single state or targeted download):
# List index files (no credentials needed)
aws s3 ls s3://gt990datalake-rawdata/Indices/990xmls/ --no-sign-request
# Download index (~925 MB)
aws s3 cp s3://gt990datalake-rawdata/Indices/990xmls/index_all_years_efiledata_xmls_created_on_2023-10-29.csv . --no-sign-request
# Download specific XML
aws s3 cp s3://gt990datalake-rawdata/EfileData/XmlFiles/202233259349300703_public.xml . --no-sign-request
# Batch download for single state (using our script)
python scripts/batch_download_990s.py --state MA --health-only --concurrent 1000
ZIP Archives (for all states / nationwide):
# Download all 97 ZIPs (~38 GB) to local directory
./scripts/download_990_zips.sh
# Extract all ZIPs to get ~384K XMLs (~95 GB)
./scripts/extract_990_zips.sh
# Build local index for fast lookup
python scripts/build_990_local_index.py
# Now enrich from local files (no network needed!)
python scripts/enrich_all_states_990.py
Python Access:
import boto3
from botocore import UNSIGNED
from botocore.config import Config
# Configure anonymous S3 client
s3 = boto3.client('s3', config=Config(signature_version=UNSIGNED))
# Download individual XML
xml_obj = s3.get_object(
Bucket='gt990datalake-rawdata',
Key='EfileData/XmlFiles/202233259349300703_public.xml'
)
xml_content = xml_obj['Body'].read()
# Download ZIP
zip_obj = s3.get_object(
Bucket='gt990datalake-rawdata',
Key='EfileData/XmlZips/2023_TEOS_XML_01A.zip'
)
zip_content = zip_obj['Body'].read()
Index Schema:
The CSV index contains: EIN, TaxPeriod, ObjectId, URL, FormType, OrganizationName, DLN, SubmittedOn
Key Advantages:
- Raw XML Access: Extract ANY field from Form 990, including custom/rare fields
- No Query Costs: Download once, parse locally (unlike BigQuery queries)
- Offline Processing: Process on your own infrastructure without rate limits
- Complete Historical Data: All e-filed 990s since 2011
- Batch Downloads: Download thousands of XMLs in parallel
- No Authentication: Public S3 bucket (no AWS account needed)
Use Cases:
- Custom Field Extraction: Parse fields not available in BigQuery (e.g., specific schedules)
- Bulk Enrichment: Download and process thousands of nonprofits locally
- Offline Analysis: Build your own database from raw XML
- Historical Trends: Analyze 10+ years of financial data
- Grant Research: Extract detailed grant recipient lists from Form 990 Schedule I
BibTeX Citation:
@misc{givingtuesday990data,
title = {GivingTuesday 990 Data Infrastructure},
author = {{GivingTuesday}},
year = {2023},
url = {https://990data.givingtuesday.org/},
note = {AWS S3 data lake of IRS Form 990 XML filings. Bucket: s3://gt990datalake-rawdata. Coverage: 5.4M+ filings (2011-present)}
}
Integration:
- IRS EO-BMF provides the complete organization registry (1.9M+ orgs)
- GivingTuesday Data Lake enriches with raw XML for custom parsing
- Google BigQuery offers SQL interface for standard fields
- ProPublica API adds web-friendly access for individual lookups
Complements:
- See Form 990 XML Data (GivingTuesday Data Lake) for detailed integration guide
- See Form 990 Enrichment Guide for usage examples
- See IRS Bulk Data Integration for EO-BMF foundation layer
Attribution: When publishing analyses using this data, please cite:
- GivingTuesday 990 Data Infrastructure: https://990data.givingtuesday.org/
- Our enrichment tools: https://github.com/getcommunityone/open-navigator-for-engagement
ProPublica Nonprofit Explorerβ
Organization: ProPublica, Inc.
What we use: Enhanced financial data and detailed Form 990 filings to complement IRS EO-BMF bulk data.
- Source: https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/
- API Documentation: https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/api
- Coverage: 3,000,000+ organizations, 10+ years of historical data
- Data Included:
- Total revenue, expenses, assets, liabilities
- Executive compensation (top 5 highest paid)
- Program service expenses vs. administrative overhead
- NTEE classification codes (National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities)
- EIN (Employer Identification Number) for verification
- Rate Limits: Free, unlimited access (respectful use recommended: ~1 req/sec)
- API Limitation: Returns max 25 results per request, no pagination (use IRS EO-BMF for bulk downloads)
- License: Free for research and commercial use
BibTeX:
@misc{propublica_nonprofits,
author = {{ProPublica}},
title = {Nonprofit Explorer},
year = {2024},
url = {https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/},
note = {Accessed: 2024}
}
ProPublica Congress APIβ
Organization: ProPublica, Inc.
What we use: Legislative data including roll-call votes, member information, bills, and congressional activity to link policy decisions to government meetings.
- Source: https://projects.propublica.org/api-docs/congress-api/
- API Documentation: https://projects.propublica.org/api-docs/congress-api/
- Coverage: U.S. Congress data from 102nd Congress (1991) to present
- Data Included:
- Roll-call votes by member and bill
- Bill information, status, and amendments
- Member biographical data and voting records
- Committee assignments and leadership
- Congressional statements and floor appearances
- Access: API Key Required (Free - sign up at https://www.propublica.org/datastore/api/propublica-congress-api)
- Authentication: Include as HTTP header:
X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY - Rate Limits: 5,000 requests per day
- License: Free for non-commercial and commercial use with attribution
Use Cases:
- Link local government meetings to federal legislation
- Track how elected officials vote on issues discussed locally
- Correlate campaign contributions with voting patterns
BibTeX:
@misc{propublica_congress,
author = {{ProPublica}},
title = {Congress API},
year = {2024},
url = {https://projects.propublica.org/api-docs/congress-api/},
note = {Accessed: 2024}
}
Federal Election Commission (FEC) - Bulk Data & OpenFEC APIβ
Organization: Federal Election Commission (FEC), U.S. Government
What we use: PRIMARY SOURCE for campaign finance data - individual contributions, candidate filings, committee data, and political expenditures for comprehensive campaign finance analysis.
- OpenFEC API: https://api.open.fec.gov/developers/
- Bulk Data Portal: https://www.fec.gov/data/browse-data/?tab=bulk-data
- Documentation: https://www.fec.gov/campaign-finance-data/
- Coverage: Complete FEC data from 1980s to present (updated nightly)
- Data Included:
- Individual contributions $200+ (Schedule A)
- Operating expenditures (Schedule B)
- Candidate master files (House, Senate, Presidential)
- Committee master files (PACs, Super PACs, party committees)
- Campaign finance totals by election cycle
- Independent expenditures and electioneering communications
- Access Methods:
- Bulk Downloads: Free, unlimited, no API key (CSV and FEC format)
- OpenFEC API: Free with API key (1,000 requests/hour)
- Demo Key: 30 requests/hour (no registration)
- API Key: Free at https://api.data.gov/signup/
- License: Public Domain (U.S. Government)
- Update Frequency: Nightly (most datasets)
Use Cases:
- Map donor networks and political influence patterns
- Link nonprofit leadership donations to policy decisions
- Track campaign finance in health advocacy organizations
- Analyze funding sources for ballot initiatives
- Cross-reference contributions with government grant awards
- "Follow the money" from donor to policy outcome
Critical Policy Restriction:
- β οΈ Cannot use contributor data for commercial solicitation or fundraising
- FEC data is for transparency and research, not marketing
BibTeX:
@misc{fec_data_2024,
author = {{Federal Election Commission}},
title = {Campaign Finance Data and Bulk Downloads},
year = {2024},
url = {https://www.fec.gov/data/},
note = {Updated nightly. Accessed: 2024}
}
@misc{openfec_api_2024,
author = {{Federal Election Commission}},
title = {OpenFEC API},
year = {2024},
url = {https://api.open.fec.gov/developers/},
note = {RESTful API for campaign finance data. Accessed: 2024}
}
Integration: discovery/fec_integration.py
ProPublica Campaign Finance APIβ
Organization: ProPublica, Inc.
What we use: Simplified access to FEC data with pre-aggregated summaries and top donor analysis (complements direct FEC data access).
- Source: https://projects.propublica.org/api-docs/campaign-finance/
- API Documentation: https://projects.propublica.org/api-docs/campaign-finance/
- Coverage: FEC data from 2000 election cycle to present
- Data Included:
- Candidate financial summaries and filings
- Committee information and contributions
- Individual and organizational donor data
- Independent expenditures and disbursements
- Top donors by industry and geography
- Access: API Key Required (Free - sign up at https://www.propublica.org/datastore/api/campaign-finance-api)
- Authentication: Include as HTTP header:
X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY - Rate Limits: 5,000 requests per day
- License: Free for non-commercial and commercial use with attribution
Note: ProPublica API provides easier-to-use summaries of FEC data. For bulk analysis, use FEC Bulk Downloads directly.
Use Cases:
- Quick lookups of candidate finance summaries
- Pre-aggregated top donor analysis
- Industry contribution patterns
- Journalist-friendly data formatting
BibTeX:
@misc{propublica_campaign_finance,
author = {{ProPublica}},
title = {Campaign Finance API},
year = {2024},
url = {https://projects.propublica.org/api-docs/campaign-finance/},
note = {Accessed: 2024}
}
ProPublica Vital Signs APIβ
Organization: ProPublica, Inc.
What we use: Healthcare provider data including doctors, facilities, disciplinary actions, and Medicare participation to support oral health policy analysis.
- Source: https://projects.propublica.org/vital-signs/
- API Documentation: https://projects.propublica.org/api-docs/vital-signs/
- Coverage: 1,000,000+ healthcare providers across the United States
- Data Included:
- Doctor biographical information and specialties
- Medical school and residency training
- Hospital affiliations and group practices
- State medical board disciplinary actions
- Medicare participation and payments
- Malpractice claims and settlements
- Access: API Key Required (Free - sign up at https://www.propublica.org/datastore/api/vital-signs-api)
- Authentication: Include as HTTP header:
X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY - Rate Limits: 5,000 requests per day
- License: Free for non-commercial and commercial use with attribution
Use Cases:
- Map dental care access and provider availability
- Link health policy discussions to provider networks
- Identify healthcare deserts and underserved areas
- Track quality metrics for oral health providers
- Correlate public health outcomes with provider density
BibTeX:
@misc{propublica_vital_signs,
author = {{ProPublica}},
title = {Vital Signs: Health Care Provider Data},
year = {2024},
url = {https://projects.propublica.org/vital-signs/},
note = {Accessed: 2024}
}
Every.org Charity APIβ
Organization: Every.org (Public Benefit Corporation)
What we use: Human-readable mission statements, organization logos, cause categories, cleaner metadata than raw IRS filings.
- API Documentation: https://www.every.org/nonprofit-api
- Coverage: 1,000,000+ verified nonprofits
- Data Included:
- Mission statements and descriptions
- Organization logos and images
- Cause tags (health, education, environment, etc.)
- Social media links
- Access: API key required (free tier available)
- License: API Terms of Service
Findhelp.org (Aunt Bertha)β
Organization: Findhelp (formerly Aunt Bertha)
What we use: Comprehensive directory of local social services - specific programs, hours, eligibility requirements, contact information.
- Source: https://www.findhelp.org/
- Coverage: 400,000+ community programs across the United States
- Data Included:
- Program descriptions and services offered
- Days/hours of operation
- Eligibility requirements
- Languages spoken
- Insurance accepted
- Contact information (phone, email, address)
- Access: Public search available, API access by request
- Use Case: Manual enrichment of ProPublica financial data with service delivery details
Example: https://www.findhelp.org/search?query=dental&location=Tuscaloosa,%20AL
211 Regional Directoriesβ
What we use: Regional social services directories with detailed program information, crisis hotlines, local resources.
- Source: https://www.211.org/ (national network)
- Example: https://www.211connects.org (Alabama)
- Coverage: Local services in most U.S. cities and counties
- Data Included:
- Specific services and programs
- Hours of operation
- Eligibility criteria
- Languages and accessibility
- Access: Public search, some regions offer data partnerships
- License: Varies by region
Association of Religion Data Archives (ARDA)β
Organization: Pennsylvania State University
What we use: U.S. Congregational Life Survey and denominational data for understanding church characteristics, programs, and community services including health ministries.
- Source: https://www.thearda.com/
- Data Portal: https://www.thearda.com/data-archive
- U.S. Congregational Life Survey: https://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/USCONGLIFE.asp
- Coverage: 300,000+ congregations with detailed program data
- License: Free for research and non-commercial use
Key Datasets:
| Dataset | Coverage | Variables |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Congregations | All denominations, 50 states | Congregation size, programs, community services |
| Religious Congregations & Membership Study | County-level data | Adherents, congregations by denomination |
| National Congregations Study | Representative sample of 1,200+ | Worship, programs, social services |
What We Extract:
- Congregation size and attendance
- Health ministry programs (dental, medical, mental health)
- Food programs and community meals
- Youth and senior programs
- Community outreach budget
- Social service partnerships
Example Use Case:
Identify churches with active health ministries in Tuscaloosa, AL that provide free dental kits, health screenings, or partner with mobile dental units.
Citation:
@misc{arda_congregations,
author = {{Association of Religion Data Archives}},
title = {U.S. Congregational Life Survey},
year = {2024},
publisher = {Pennsylvania State University},
url = {https://www.thearda.com/},
note = {Free for research use}
}
Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD): Places of Worshipβ
Organization: U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
What we use: Geospatial database of 350,000+ places of worship for mapping faith-based health service locations and identifying service gaps.
- Source: https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com/
- Dataset: https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/places-of-worship
- Format: Shapefile, GeoJSON, CSV
- Coverage: 350,000+ churches, mosques, synagogues, temples
- License: Public Domain (U.S. Government)
Fields Available:
- Name of place of worship
- Address (street, city, state, ZIP)
- Latitude/Longitude (precise geolocation)
- Denomination
- Religious tradition
- Facility type
Use Cases:
- Map faith-based health providers - Overlay churches with health ministries on city maps
- Identify service deserts - Find areas underserved by both clinics and church programs
- Route mobile dental units - Plan stops at large congregations
- Partnership outreach - Locate churches near schools or clinics
Citation:
"Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD): Places of Worship. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com/"
National Congregations Study (NCS)β
Organization: Duke University
What we use: Representative survey of U.S. congregations to understand social service provision, health programs, and civic engagement patterns.
- Source: https://sites.duke.edu/ncsweb/
- Principal Investigator: Mark Chaves, Duke University Divinity School
- Coverage: 1,200+ congregations (representative sample)
- Waves: 1998, 2006-07, 2012, 2018-19
- License: Free for academic and research use
Key Findings:
- 60% of congregations provide social services (food, housing, health)
- 15% of congregations have health-related programs
- Large urban churches (500+ attendees) more likely to have formal health ministries
- 25% collaborate with clinics, hospitals, or health departments
Variables We Use:
| Variable | Description | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
HLTHPROG | Has health-related program | Health ministry presence |
FOODPROG | Operates food program | Nutrition education opportunity |
YOUTHPROG | Youth programs | Reach children for dental education |
SENIORPROG | Senior programs | Medicare enrollment help |
PARTNERSHIP | Partners with nonprofits | Collaboration potential |
Citation:
@misc{ncs_2018,
author = {Chaves, Mark and Anderson, Shawna},
title = {National Congregations Study: Cumulative Dataset (1998, 2006-07, 2012, 2018-19)},
year = {2020},
publisher = {Duke University},
url = {https://sites.duke.edu/ncsweb/},
doi = {10.1093/soc/swaa029}
}
Microsoft Common Data Model for Nonprofitsβ
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
What we use: Nonprofit data standardization, constituent relationship management, donor tracking, program outcome measurement.
- Repository: https://github.com/microsoft/Nonprofits/tree/master/CommonDataModelforNonprofits
- ERD Documentation: common-data-model-for-nonprofits-erds.pdf
- License: MIT License
- Coverage: Donor management, fundraising, program delivery, volunteer management, impact measurement
Microsoft CDM Entities Implemented:
| Microsoft CDM Entity | Our Entity | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Constituent | CONSTITUENT | Donors, volunteers, members, beneficiaries |
| Donation | DONATION | Financial contributions and in-kind gifts |
| Campaign | CAMPAIGN | Fundraising campaigns and appeals |
| Designation | DESIGNATION | Fund allocation (unrestricted, restricted, endowment) |
| Membership | MEMBERSHIP | Member enrollment and renewals |
| Volunteer Preference | VOLUNTEER_ACTIVITY | Volunteer hours and activities |
| Delivery Framework | PROGRAM_DELIVERY | Programs and services delivered |
| Objective | PROGRAM_OUTCOME | Measurable impact and KPIs |
Integration Benefits:
- β Dynamics 365 Nonprofit compatibility
- β Power Platform (Power BI, Power Apps, Power Automate)
- β Azure Synapse analytics
- β Constituent 360 view
β Fact-Checkingβ
In this section:
Google Fact Check Tools APIβ
Organization: Google LLC
What we use: Aggregated fact-checking data for verifying claims from meetings and legislation.
- Source: https://toolbox.google.com/factcheck/explorer
- API: https://developers.google.com/fact-check/tools/api
- Schema: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/factcheck
- Coverage: 100+ fact-checking organizations worldwide
- License: Free API (10,000 queries/day quota)
FactCheck.orgβ
Organization: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania
What we use: Nonpartisan fact-checking of political claims and health policy verification.
- Source: https://www.factcheck.org/
- Coverage: National politics, health claims, science, viral content (2003-present)
- License: Free (web scraping allowed with rate limiting)
PolitiFactβ
Organization: Poynter Institute (Pulitzer Prize-winning)
What we use: State-level fact-checking, Truth-O-Meter ratings for ballot measures.
- Source: https://www.politifact.com/
- Coverage: All 50 states, federal politics (2007-present)
- Rating Scale: True, Mostly True, Half True, Mostly False, False, Pants on Fire
- License: Free (web scraping allowed with rate limiting)
π» Civic Tech & Open Sourceβ
In this section:
- Cloud & Data Platforms
- Civic Tech Field Guide
- Code for America: Brigade Network
- U.S. Digital Response (USDR)
- Digital Public Goods Alliance (DPGA)
Cloud & Data Platformsβ
Organization: Microsoft Corporation / GitHub, Inc.
What we use: GitHub REST and GraphQL APIs for tracking civic tech projects, hackathons, contributors, and open source development.
- Source: https://docs.github.com/en/rest
- GraphQL API: https://docs.github.com/en/graphql
- Rate Limits: 5,000 requests/hour (authenticated)
- License: Free (API usage subject to GitHub Terms of Service)
Data Extracted:
| Dataset | Description | Fields Tracked |
|---|---|---|
github_repositories | Civic tech projects and repos | name, stars, forks, topics, language, license |
contributors | Project maintainers and contributors | login, contributions, role, github_sponsor_enabled |
project_issues | Good first issues, help wanted | labels, state, title, created_at |
project_funding | GitHub Sponsors, OpenCollective | funding_type, sponsor_count, monthly_amount |
hackathon_projects | Projects built at civic hackathons | hackathon_id, project_name, repo_url, demo_url |
Civic Tech Topics Tracked:
civic-tech,open-government,government-transparencypublic-data,open-data,civic-engagementdemocracy,accountability,policy-analysis
Why GitHub API:
- Discovery: Find civic tech projects and open source tools
- Collaboration: Track contributors and maintainers
- Opportunities: Surface "good first issue" labels for new contributors
- Funding: Identify projects needing financial support
- Hackathons: Document projects built at civic hackathon events
Implementation:
# Our platform uses:
- /civic_tech/github_repositories # Project metadata
- /civic_tech/contributors # Maintainer info
- /civic_tech/project_issues # Contribution opportunities
- /civic_tech/project_funding # Financial support
- /civic_tech/hackathon_projects # Hackathon outputs
Citation:
@misc{github_api,
author = {{GitHub, Inc.}},
title = {GitHub REST API and GraphQL API},
year = {2024},
url = {https://docs.github.com/en/rest},
note = {API for accessing repository data, issues, contributors, and project metadata}
}
Civic Tech Field Guideβ
Organization: Compiler LA
What we use: Curated directory of 1,000+ civic technology projects categorized by issue area and impact.
- Source: https://civictech.guide/
- Dataset: https://airtable.com/shr8yfQ5p3CJGMnCs/tblv0VlP8vVGIBYI6
- Format: CSV, Airtable API
- License: Open Database License (ODbL)
Categories:
- Democracy & Voting
- Environment & Climate
- Housing & Homelessness
- Criminal Justice
- Education
- Health & Safety
- Economic Justice
- Infrastructure
Notable Projects Catalogued:
- OpenBudget Oakland (Budget transparency)
- Food Oasis (Food access mapping)
- Health Equity Tracker (CDC data visualization)
- City Scrapers (Meeting minutes automation)
- Documenters Network (Public meeting coverage)
Why Civic Tech Field Guide:
- Taxonomy: Standardized categorization of civic tech projects
- Discovery: Find existing tools before building new ones
- Inspiration: Learn from successful civic tech implementations
- Collaboration: Connect with project maintainers
Citation:
@misc{civic_tech_field_guide,
author = {{Compiler LA}},
title = {Civic Tech Field Guide},
year = {2024},
url = {https://civictech.guide/},
note = {Curated directory of 1,000+ civic technology projects}
}
Code for America: Brigade Networkβ
Organization: Code for America
What we use: Brigade chapter locations, hackathon events, and civic tech projects built by local volunteer groups.
- Source: https://brigade.codeforamerica.org/
- Brigades: https://brigade.codeforamerica.org/brigades
- Projects: https://brigade.codeforamerica.org/projects
- License: Public information, project-specific licenses vary
Brigade Network:
- 80+ active brigades across the United States
- Monthly civic hack nights and community meetups
- Annual National Day of Civic Hacking
- CodeAcross weekend hackathons
Notable Brigade Projects:
| Project | Brigade | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| OpenBudget Oakland | Code for Oakland | Budget transparency & visualization |
| Food Oasis | Hack for LA | Map food resources (300+ locations) |
| Health Equity Tracker | Code for America | CDC health disparities data |
| BallotNav | National | Ballot drop-off location finder |
| Documenters | City Bureau (Chicago) | Public meeting coverage network |
Hackathon Events Tracked:
| Event | Frequency | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| National Day of Civic Hacking | Annual (June) | Nationwide simultaneous hackathons |
| CodeAcross | Annual (February) | Local government collaboration |
| Monthly Hack Nights | Monthly | Ongoing project development |
Brigade Data in Our Platform:
# We track:
- /civic_tech/brigade_chapters # 80+ locations with contact info
- /civic_tech/hackathons # Events: CodeAcross, NDoCH
- /civic_tech/hackathon_projects # Projects built at events
- /civic_tech/hackathon_participants # Contributors and attendees
Citation:
@misc{code_for_america_brigade,
author = {{Code for America}},
title = {Brigade Network: Volunteer Civic Technology},
year = {2024},
url = {https://brigade.codeforamerica.org/},
note = {80+ local volunteer groups building civic technology}
}
U.S. Digital Response (USDR)β
Organization: U.S. Digital Response
What we use: Emergency civic tech projects and rapid-response open source tools for government needs.
- Source: https://www.usdigitalresponse.org/
- Projects: https://github.com/usdigitalresponse
- License: Varies by project (mostly MIT, Apache 2.0)
Key Projects:
| Project | Purpose | Tech Stack |
|---|---|---|
| grants-ingest | Federal grant opportunity aggregation | Python, PostgreSQL |
| usdr-gost | Grant opportunity management system | TypeScript, React |
| cpf-reporter | Compliance reporting automation | Node.js |
Focus Areas:
- COVID-19 Response: Vaccine distribution, testing sites
- Emergency Management: Disaster response coordination
- Grants & Funding: Grant opportunity discovery
- Government Modernization: UI/UX improvements for gov services
Why USDR:
- Rapid Response: Builds tools during emergencies
- Open Source: All code publicly available
- Government Partnership: Works directly with agencies
- Reusable Tools: Solutions applicable to multiple jurisdictions
Citation:
@misc{us_digital_response,
author = {{U.S. Digital Response}},
title = {Open Source Civic Technology for Emergency Response},
year = {2024},
url = {https://www.usdigitalresponse.org/},
note = {Rapid-response civic tech projects for government needs}
}
Digital Public Goods Alliance (DPGA)β
Organization: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Norway, Sierra Leone, Germany
What we use: Registry of 500+ Digital Public Goods (DPGs) certified as open source projects meeting UN Sustainable Development Goals.
- Source: https://digitalpublicgoods.net/
- Registry: https://digitalpublicgoods.net/registry/
- Standard: https://digitalpublicgoods.net/standard/
- License: CC0 1.0 Universal (registry data)
DPG Standard Requirements:
- β Open License: OSI-approved, Creative Commons
- β Open Source: Public code repositories
- β Documentation: Clear usage instructions
- β Privacy & Security: Data protection mechanisms
- β Standards: Adheres to relevant standards
- β SDG Alignment: Supports UN Sustainable Development Goals
Notable Digital Public Goods:
| DPG | Category | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| OpenStreetMap | Geographic data | Global collaborative mapping |
| DHIS2 | Health information | Used in 100+ countries |
| Open Food Network | Food systems | Local food marketplace platform |
| Ushahidi | Crisis response | Crowdsourced incident reporting |
| Khan Academy | Education | Free online learning platform |
Why DPGA:
- Certification: Vetted open source projects
- SDG Alignment: Projects tied to development goals
- Sustainability: Focus on long-term viability
- Global Impact: International collaboration
Our Use Case:
# We track DPG-certified civic tech projects:
- /civic_tech/github_repositories (dpg_certified = true)
- /civic_tech/project_metadata (sdg_goals = [...])
Citation:
@misc{digital_public_goods_alliance,
author = {{Digital Public Goods Alliance}},
title = {Digital Public Goods Registry},
year = {2024},
url = {https://digitalpublicgoods.net/},
note = {500+ open source projects certified as Digital Public Goods}
}
π Community Solutions & Use Casesβ
In this section:
- Spectrum of Community Engagement to Ownership
- Harvard Ash Center: Data-Smart City Solutions (Archived)
- Brookings Institution: Data-Driven Policymaking
- Open Data Impact: Evidence-Based Research
Spectrum of Community Engagement to Ownershipβ
Organization: Facilitating Power, Rosa GonzΓ‘lez
What we use: Framework for community-driven governance that maps to our data structure (nonprofits, jurisdictions, grants, officials).
- Source: https://movementstrategy.org/
- Framework: https://movementstrategy.org/b/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Spectrum-of-Community-Engagement-to-Ownership.pdf
- Article: "From Community Engagement to Ownership"
- License: Creative Commons (educational use)
The Spectrum Framework - Four Key Sectors:
| Sector | Maps to Our Data | Community Role |
|---|---|---|
| Community-Based Organizations | /nonprofits | Grassroots leadership, lived experience |
| City/County Staff | /jurisdictions | Government accountability, service delivery |
| Philanthropic Partners | /grants | Resource allocation, funding equity |
| Facilitative Leaders | /officials | Elected officials, decision makers |
Engagement Levels:
- Inform β One-way communication
- Consult β Gather input, government decides
- Involve β Work together on solutions
- Collaborate β Shared decision-making
- Defer to β Community-driven governance
Real-World Case Studies:
Providence, RI: Racial and Environmental Justice Committee
- Challenge: Environmental hazards disproportionately affect communities of color
- Our Data:
/jurisdictions/demographics+/nonprofits/environmental_orgs+/meetings/public_hearings - Outcome: Moved from "consulting" to "community-driven" - residents now co-chair committee
- Metrics: Track using
/analytics/metric_views- meeting attendance, community proposals adopted
Portland, OR: Equity Working Group
- Challenge: Budget decisions lacked community input
- Our Data:
/budgets/city_budgets+/nonprofits/advocacy_orgs+/officials/city_council - Outcome: Participatory budgeting with community ownership
- Metrics: Track using
/analytics/dashboard_metrics- community budget proposals, funding allocated
How Our Platform Supports the Spectrum:
- Inform:
/meetings/agendas+/documentsfor transparency - Consult:
/surveys+/factchecksfor informed input - Involve:
/civic_tech/hackathons+/nonprofits/volunteer_activities - Collaborate:
/grants/participatory_budgeting+/legislation/co-creation - Defer to:
/analytics/community_impact_metrics
Citation:
@article{gonzalez_spectrum,
author = {GonzΓ‘lez, Rosa},
title = {Spectrum of Community Engagement to Ownership},
organization = {Facilitating Power},
year = {2021},
url = {https://movementstrategy.org/}
}
Harvard Ash Center: Data-Smart City Solutions (Archived)β
Organization: Harvard Kennedy School Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation
What we use: Research on how data engineering impacts community outcomes - informs our /analytics/metric_views templates.
- Source: https://ash.harvard.edu/
- Note: Data-Smart City Solutions initiative (archived) - use cases based on historical civic data research
- License: Educational use
Example Use Cases from Data-Smart Research:
Use Case 1: Youth Obesity Prevention (Austin, TX)
Problem: Childhood obesity rates 30% higher in low-income neighborhoods
Data Integration:
# Our platform combines:
- /jurisdictions/demographics # BMI, income, age
- /nonprofits (NTEE K30) # Food access programs
- /civic_tech/food_oasis # Food desert mapping
- /meetings/school_board # Nutrition policy discussions
Outcome:
- Identified 15 "food deserts" lacking fresh produce
- Partnered with 8 nonprofits to launch mobile markets
- School board approved healthier lunch standards
Metrics We Track:
- Metric View:
youth_nutrition_access - KPIs: Fresh food outlets per capita, school lunch quality scores, childhood obesity trends
- Dashboard:
/analytics/dashboard_metrics/health_equity
Use Case 2: College Readiness (Mesa Public Schools, AZ)
Problem: 40% of students off-track for college by 9th grade
Data Integration:
# Our platform combines:
- /school_districts/nces_data # Enrollment, demographics
- /school_districts/budgets # Per-pupil spending, program funding
- /analytics/date_dimension # Time-series tracking
- /surveys/student_surveys # Student engagement, aspirations
Outcome:
- Early warning system identifies at-risk students
- Targeted interventions (tutoring, mentorship)
- College enrollment increased 15%
Metrics We Track:
- Metric View:
college_readiness_pipeline - KPIs: On-track percentage, intervention effectiveness, college enrollment rates
- Dashboard:
/analytics/dashboard_metrics/education_outcomes
Our Use Case Template:
For each community challenge, we provide:
- Problem Definition β What data shows the issue
- Data Integration β Which datasets to combine
- Analytics View β Pre-built metric views
- Action Pathways β Nonprofits, officials, meetings to engage
- Success Metrics β How to measure impact
Citation:
@misc{harvard_datasmart_use_cases,
author = {{Harvard Kennedy School Ash Center}},
title = {Data-Smart City Solutions: Civic Data Use Cases},
year = {2016},
note = {Archived civic data research initiative},
url = {https://ash.harvard.edu/}
}
Brookings Institution: Data-Driven Policymakingβ
Organization: Brookings Institution, Center on Regulation and Markets
What we use: Data Academy model for turning "Open Data" into "Accessible Data" - validates our /domains and /standards architecture.
- Source: https://www.brookings.edu/
- Article: "How Citizens and Local Governments Advance Data-Driven Policymaking"
- License: Public research
The Data Academy Model:
Case Study: Tempe, AZ
Workflow:
City Creates Dashboard β Residents Attend Data Academy β Data Informs Policy
(/standards) (/meetings/trainings) (/legislation)
Our Platform Support:
| Stage | City Action | Our Data | Resident Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Publish | Open data portal | /standards/schema_org_jsonld | Machine-readable datasets |
| 2. Train | Data Academy | /meetings/trainings | Residents learn SQL, Tableau |
| 3. Analyze | Dashboard access | /analytics/dashboard_metrics | Community-driven insights |
| 4. Advocate | Public testimony | /meetings/public_hearings | Data-backed proposals |
| 5. Legislate | Policy adoption | /legislation/local_ordinances | Evidence-based laws |
Example: Tempe Water Conservation Policy
Data Stack:
- Raw Data:
/jurisdictions/budget_data- Water department spending - Standards:
/standards/ceds_aligned- Standardized metrics - Training:
/meetings/trainings- "Water Data 101" workshop - Analytics:
/analytics/metric_views/water_usage_per_capita - Outcome:
/legislation- New conservation ordinance passed
Residents Learned:
- How to query public datasets
- How to create visualizations
- How to present findings to city council
Case Study: Norfolk, VA - Flooding Resilience
Problem: Sea level rise threatens low-income neighborhoods
Data Integration:
# Our platform combines:
- /jurisdictions/demographics # Vulnerable populations
- /budgets/city_budgets # Infrastructure spending
- /nonprofits (NTEE W) # Environmental advocacy
- /meetings/public_hearings # Community testimony
- /standards/schema_org_jsonld # GeoJSON flood maps
Data Academy Curriculum:
- Week 1: Understanding flood risk data
- Week 2: Budget analysis (where does money go?)
- Week 3: Creating data visualizations
- Week 4: Presenting to city council
Outcome:
- 50 residents trained
- Community-led flood resilience plan
- $10M infrastructure investment in vulnerable areas
Why Data Academies Matter:
Traditional Model (Fails):
- City: "Here's a 500-page PDF budget"
- Residents: Can't understand it, disengage
Data Academy Model (Works):
- City: "Here's open data + training"
- Residents: Build skills, create analysis, influence policy
Our Role:
- Standardize Data:
/standards/popolo_exportsmakes data interoperable - Host Training Events:
/meetings/trainingstracks Data Academy schedules - Provide Analytics:
/analytics/metric_viewsoffers ready-to-use dashboards - Connect Stakeholders:
/nonprofits+/officials+/civic_tech= collaboration
Citation:
@article{brookings_data_driven,
author = {{Brookings Institution}},
title = {How Citizens and Local Governments Advance Data-Driven Policymaking},
journal = {Brookings Center on Regulation and Markets},
year = {2023},
url = {https://www.brookings.edu/}
}
Open Data Impact: Evidence-Based Researchβ
Organization: The GovLab at New York University (NYU Tandon School of Engineering)
What we use: Evidence-based research on open data impact - validates our platform's approach and demonstrates measurable outcomes from open data initiatives.
- Source: https://odimpact.org/
- Key Findings Report: https://odimpact.org/key-findings.html
- Full Report: https://odimpact.org/files/open-data-impact-key-findings.pdf
- Funded by: Omidyar Network
- License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Research Overview:
19 Global Case Studies analyzing what works in open data:
- Sectoral and geographic representativeness
- First-hand interviews with stakeholders
- Measurable, tangible impact analysis
- Best practices and enabling conditions
Economic Impact Estimates:
- McKinsey (2013): $3 trillion per year global value of open data
- Omidyar Network Study: $13 trillion over 5 years in G20 nations
Four Main Impact Dimensions:
| Impact Type | Description | Our Platform Support |
|---|---|---|
| Improving Government | Transparency, accountability, efficiency | /jurisdictions/budgets + /meetings + /legislation |
| Empowering Citizens | Informed decision-making, participation | /analytics/dashboards + /surveys + /factchecks |
| Creating Opportunity | Economic innovation, new businesses | /civic_tech + /grants + /nonprofits |
| Solving Public Problems | Data-driven solutions to complex issues | /community_solutions + /metric_views |
Enabling Conditions for Success:
1. Supply-Side (Data Providers):
- Quality Data: Accurate, timely, machine-readable
- Our Implementation:
/standards/schema_org_jsonld,/standards/popolo_exports
2. Demand-Side (Data Users):
- Capacity Building: Skills to analyze and use data
- Our Implementation:
/meetings/trainings(Data Academies),/analytics/metric_views
3. Intermediaries:
- Data Translators: Organizations bridging supply and demand
- Our Implementation:
/civic_tech/brigade_chapters,/nonprofits/advocacy_orgs
4. Ecosystem:
- Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration: Government + Civic Tech + Nonprofits
- Our Implementation:
/community_solutions/stakeholder_mapping
Key Challenges Identified:
| Challenge | ODI Findings | Our Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Data Quality | Incomplete, outdated data | Automated ingestion + validation pipelines |
| Technical Capacity | Users lack skills to analyze | Pre-built dashboards + metric views |
| Sustainability | Projects depend on grants | Open-source + reusable infrastructure |
| Privacy Risks | Potential for harm | Anonymization + ethical data standards |
10 Recommendations for Next-Generation Open Data:
- Focus on Demand, Not Just Supply β We provide ready-to-use analytics
- Build User Capacity β Data Academies tracked in
/meetings/trainings - Create Data Intermediaries β Civic tech projects in
/civic_tech - Ensure Data Quality β Standards compliance (
/standards) - Enable Interoperability β OCD-ID, Popolo, Schema.org integration
- Measure Impact β
/analytics/metric_views+/community_solutions/metrics - Sustain Engagement β Open-source + HuggingFace hosting
- Mitigate Risks β Privacy-first design, anonymization
- Foster Collaboration β Multi-stakeholder
/community_solutions - Scale What Works β Reusable templates + case studies
How We Apply ODI Research:
Our Platform as Evidence-Based Open Data Infrastructure:
- Supply: 90K+ jurisdictions, 3M+ nonprofits, 500K+ meetings β standardized datasets
- Demand: Pre-built dashboards, metric views, analytics β accessible to non-technical users
- Intermediaries: Civic tech projects, brigade chapters, nonprofits β data translators
- Ecosystem: Community solutions framework β multi-stakeholder collaboration
Real-World Validation:
ODI case studies demonstrate that open data works when:
- β Data is standardized β We use OCD-ID, Popolo, Schema.org
- β Users have capacity β We provide training + dashboards
- β Intermediaries bridge gaps β We integrate civic tech projects
- β Impact is measured β We track metrics + outcomes
Example ODI Case Study Applied to Our Platform:
Chile's Budget Transparency (ODI Case Study):
- Problem: Citizens couldn't understand government budgets
- Solution: Open budget data + visualization tools
- Impact: Increased public participation in budget process
Our Implementation:
# Replicating Chile's success:
- /jurisdictions/budget_data # Open budget data (supply)
- /analytics/dashboard_metrics # Budget visualizations (demand)
- /meetings/trainings # Data literacy programs (capacity)
- /meetings/public_hearings # Public participation (engagement)
- /community_solutions/metrics # Budget impact tracking (measurement)
Citation:
@techreport{verhulst_open_data_impact,
author = {Verhulst, Stefaan and Young, Andrew},
title = {Open Data Impact: When Demand and Supply Meet - Key Findings of the Open Data Impact Case Studies},
institution = {The GovLab, NYU Tandon School of Engineering},
year = {2016},
url = {https://odimpact.org/key-findings.html},
note = {Supported by Omidyar Network. 19 global case studies.}
}
Why This Matters for Our Platform:
Open Data Impact provides evidence-based validation that our approach works:
- β Combining supply (data) + demand (analytics) + capacity (training) = impact
- β Multi-stakeholder collaboration drives success
- β Standardization and quality are essential
- β Impact must be measured and documented
Their research proves: Open data alone isn't enough. You need the ecosystem we're building.
---\n\n### IATI Standard (International Aid Transparency Initiative)\n\nOrganization: IATI Secretariat \nWhat we use: International development funding transparency framework - informs grant tracking, nonprofit program outcomes, and cross-sector collaboration metrics.\n\n- Source: https://iatistandard.org/\n- Current Version: IATI Standard v2.03\n- Specification: https://iatistandard.org/en/iati-standard/203/\n- License: Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By)\n- Coverage: 1,300+ publishers, $1+ trillion in development aid tracked\n- Used for: Grant funding transparency, nonprofit program measurement, community solution tracking\n\nWhy IATI in Community Solutions:\n\nIATI provides a proven framework for tracking community impact across sectors - government, nonprofits, foundations, and international partners.\n\nCitation:\nbibtex\n@misc{iati_standard,\n author = {{IATI Secretariat}},\n title = {IATI Standard Version 2.03},\n year = {2018},\n url = {https://iatistandard.org/},\n note = {Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By)}\n}\n\n\nResources:\n- Registry: https://iatiregistry.org/\n- d-Portal: https://d-portal.org/\n- Datastore: https://iatidatastore.iatistandard.org/
οΏ½π Acknowledgmentsβ
We are grateful to the following organizations and individuals:
Academic Institutions:
- Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) for MeetingBank
- Harvard University Mellon Urbanism Lab for LocalView
- Cornell University Roper Center for public opinion research
- MIT Election Data + Science Lab for election data
- University of Pennsylvania Annenberg Center for fact-checking
Civic Tech Community:
- GroundVue - Partner organization inspiring community accountability work
- Code for America - Civic technology movement and brigade network
- City Bureau - Documenters Network and City Scrapers project
- Council Data Project - Open-source municipal data infrastructure
- U.S. Digital Response - Emergency civic technology support
- Civic Tech Field Guide - Community resource and project directory
Standards Bodies:
- W3C Community Group for Schema.org
- Open Civic Data for jurisdiction identifiers (OCDEP 2)
- Popolo Project for open government data standards
- IATI Secretariat for international aid transparency
- U.S. Department of Education for CEDS
Enterprise Tech for Social Good:
- Microsoft - Tech for Social Impact (Nonprofit CDM)
- Google - Data Commons (Knowledge Graph & Civic Data API)
- AWS - Open Data for Good (Registry best practices)
- Databricks - Databricks for Good (Unity Catalog, Delta Lake, MLflow, Agent Bricks)
- Snowflake - Snowflake for Good (Data Marketplace)
- Oracle - NetSuite Social Impact (Fund accounting models)
- Salesforce - Salesforce.org (Nonprofit Success Pack)
- Cisco - Crisis Response (Network resilience)
- IBM - Science for Social Good (AI use cases)
- Meta - Data for Good (Population mapping)
Data Platforms & Organizations:
- HuggingFace for dataset hosting
- ProPublica for nonprofit financial data (3M+ organizations), congressional voting records, campaign finance data, and healthcare provider information
- Open States for legislative data
- OHDSI for OMOP Common Data Model (vocabulary system)
- Every.org for charity metadata and mission statements
- Findhelp.org for local social services directory (400K+ programs)
Government:
- U.S. Census Bureau for demographic data
- National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
- IRS for tax-exempt organization data
- CISA for .gov domain registry
- All municipal governments providing open access to meeting records
Special Thanks:
- All civic technologists building open government tools
- Municipal staff maintaining public meeting archives
- Journalists and community advocates holding power accountable
π How to Cite This Projectβ
If you use Open Navigator in your research, please cite:
Open Navigator
GitHub: https://github.com/getcommunityone/open-navigator-for-engagement
License: MIT
BibTeX:
@software{open-navigator-2026,
title = {Open Navigator},
author = {Community One},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/getcommunityone/open-navigator-for-engagement},
license = {MIT}
}
π License Complianceβ
This project respects all dataset licenses and terms of use. See LICENSE for this project's MIT license.
For dataset-specific licenses, please refer to the original sources listed above.